首页> 外文OA文献 >Two houses: legislative studies and the Atlantic divide
【2h】

Two houses: legislative studies and the Atlantic divide

机译:两院:立法研究和大西洋鸿沟

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Legislative scholars have a history of stepping back occasionally to examine the development and state of the sub-discipline (Budge 1973; Gamm and Huber 2002; Loewenberg, Patterson, and Jewell 1985; Mezey 1993; Morris-Jones 1983; Pasquino 1973; Patterson 1989). Many of these existing reviews, although valuable, are predominantly of a qualitative and subjective nature and are, in most cases, now dated. This paper provides a bibliometrical analysis of the state of legislative studies in the United States and Europe by exploring the content of eight political science journals. I looked at six general political science journals, three originating in the United States and three in Europe, as well as the content of two legislative studies journals—the American-based Legislative Studies Quarterly and the British-based Journal of Legislative Studies.
机译:立法学者有退后一步的历史,以考察子学科的发展和状况(Budge 1973; Gamm and Huber 2002; Loewenberg,Patterson,and Jewell 1985; Mezey 1993; Morris-Jones 1983; Pasquino 1973; Patterson 1989) )。这些现有评论中的许多虽然有价值,但主要是定性和主观的,并且在大多数情况下已过时。本文通过探索八种政治学期刊的内容,对美国和欧洲的立法研究状况进行了文献计量分析。我查看了六种常规政治科学期刊,其中三本起源于美国,三本起源于欧洲,以及两种立法研究期刊的内容-美国的《立法研究季刊》和英国的《立法研究期刊》。

著录项

  • 作者

    Martin, Shane G.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号